About

"The evolving Francophile..."

My husband Jack has always wanted to live in Paris and learn French. I thought it would be good for him to achieve his life time dream. Hence, we moved to Paris in 2008. My first year was difficult. I started "missives" to relieve some stress and chronicle my life so friends back in the US could read what I am experiencing. I currently write about my food in Paris, which is my passion., travel experiences, and "experiences living in Paris."

It is definitely a challenge to live here, but each year it gets easier, and quite enjoyable, in large part because I value friendships over locale. I have a love/hate relationship with Paris as do most Parisians, mais La vie est belle (but life is good)!

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Capitaine -- Restaurant Review

 

For info, directions see website: https://www.restaurantcapitaine.fr/


Rating Standards: 5-Stars = Extraordinary; 4-Stars = Excellent; 3-Stars = Average; 2-Stars = Fair; 1-Star = Poor € = Inexpensive: 30€ and under; €€ = Moderate: 31€-49€; €€€ = Expensive: €50 -75; €€€€ = Very Expensive: more than €76 (prices based on minimum 2-courses)

1-Bell = Pleasantly quiet (less than 65 decibels); 2-Bells = Can talk easily (65-70); 3-Bells = Talking normally gets difficult (70-80); 4-Bells = Can talk only in raised voices (75-90); BOMB = Too noisy for normal conversation (90+)

3.5 - star ...........................€€.......................................... 3.5-🔔 

A friend of ours recommended this restaurant, and I immediately jumped at the chance, since I’m already familiar with Le Servan. A bit of background: the Levha sisters—Katia and Tatiana, the acclaimed duo behind Le Servan—played a pivotal role in the creation of Capitaine. The menu was small, but in my book, the fewer items, the better. If you see a novel for a menu, run away. 

Back in 2014, chef Baptiste Day worked with them at Le Servan. When he branched out in 2017 to open Capitaine, the Levha sisters supported him, offering mentorship, guidance, and the benefit of their culinary vision. Their influence helped shape Capitaine as an extension of their shared approach to modern Parisian cuisine—thoughtful, inventive, and rooted in both tradition and personal heritage.

If you’re not familiar with their story, the Levha sisters draw inspiration from their Filipina mother, blending Asian flavors with French ingredients and classical techniques—a creative fusion I’ve always admired.

So I was genuinely excited to try Capitaine, having always been a fan of Le Servan.



It’s a fairly spacious restaurant with simple, unpretentious decor—no fancy linen tablecloths here. The kitchen is tiny, but the chef made it work impressively well. As for the restroom—yes, there’s only one—it’s quite small, but clean and well-kept.

The location is ideal, nestled between Le Marais and Bastille, making it easy to get to. That said, fair warning: on warm days, there’s no air conditioning, so bring a hand fan if you tend to overheat. The clientele was a diverse mix—not just locals, but visitors from all over the world, which speaks to the restaurant’s growing reputation.


NOTE: I will only review the dishes I tasted.



You will not find a menu on their website, I assume it is because they change it often. But here's a copy of the menu we were offered. 



ENTRÉES

PORK CROQUETTES. A simple dish, but beautifully executed. The filling reminded me of Southern-style shredded pork—tender, subtly seasoned, and not overly spiced. The exterior was perfectly fried: crisp, not greasy, with a lovely crunch. The accompanying mayonnaise was mild and balanced, allowing the flavors of the croquette to shine. It had that comforting, straightforward appeal you find in classic Southern fried fare. Excellent.

Note: this was a shared entrée.




VEAL TARTARE. This was my entrée. A beautifully presented entrée, with the veal tartare tucked beneath a delicate arrangement of fennel fronds, edible flowers, and salicoques (tiny shrimp like seaweed stems).

Unlike the ground version (think hamburger consistency), this tartare was cubed. Personally, I found it a bit challenging—the cubed meat retains the long muscle fibers, so each bite involved chewing through intact strands, which can feel chewy or sinewy, especially if the cut includes connective tissue or isn’t finely diced.

As a general tip: when ordering tartare, it’s worth asking where the meat was sourced and whether it was hand-chopped or machine-processed. If the latter, I’d skip it—poorly cleaned equipment increases the risk of bacterial contamination. (Don’t worry, this place seemed fine—just a note for fellow tartare fans.)

Flavor-wise, everything was well balanced and thoughtfully composed.The "bagna cauda)" (sauce made with garlic, anchovies, olive oil), was not overpowering at all. It tasted like a nice mayonnaise with a touch of anchovies. My only issue was with the texture of the veal itself. This would've been a great dish had it not been for the way the veal was prepared. Let’s just say... I had to ask for a toothpick afterward.



PLAT

TRUITE EN CROUTE. Truite en Croûte – Our waiter warned us this dish would be generous, easily enough for two, so a friend and I decided to share it. Unfortunately, the presentation was underwhelming. It arrived as a puff pastry dome over the fish with a single cabbage leaf wrapped around it. Visually, it lacked contrast—mostly shades of brown on brown. A touch of green or a bright garnish would’ve gone a long way.

As for the trout itself, I assume it was rainbow trout—the flesh was pink, almost like salmon, and surprisingly thick. It was perfectly cooked and very tender. We expected a side of vegetables, but none arrived... until we cut into the dish and found a bed of steamed cabbage hidden under the fish. Eh voilà—veggies!

My only real complaint: the flavor profile of the sauce leaned heavily citrusy, and combined with the use of garam masala (a blend of aromatic spices common in Indian and South Asian cuisines), it left a slightly bitter aftertaste. This might have been due to some of the spices not being properly bloomed (i.e., toasted to release their essential oils), which can result in bitterness. Otherwise truite en croûte on its own was perfectly cooked



DESSERTS

1. PAVLOVA – Full disclosure: I’m not a fan of Pavlovas to begin with, so take this with a grain of salt. I took one bite and, for me, it felt more like whipped cream over apricots. It was quite sweet and very cream-forward, which didn’t quite win me over. That said, the rest of the table really enjoyed it, so clearly it hit the mark for Pavlova lovers.

2. TARTLETTE– A classic strawberry and raspberry tart on an almond-flour crust. Even though I rarely eat dessert—usually just a taste for review’s sake—I’d say this was the better of the two. The fruit tasted very fresh, and my friends agreed it was the standout.

If I’m being honest, while both were enjoyable, they didn’t quite rise to the level of what you might expect from Paris or France, where dessert is often an art form. These had more of a well-made, home-style quality—comforting and familiar, but not particularly refined or inventive.



Wine- Syrah

Appearance: Deep ruby with violet hues at the rim, youthful and vibrant in the glass.

Nose: Expressive and aromatic, with notes of ripe blackberry, black cherry, and plum. Subtle hints of cracked black pepper, violet, and a touch of smoked meat or charcuterie in the background. A trace of garrigue or dried herbs suggests a southern French influence.

Palate: Medium-bodied with fresh acidity and soft, integrated tannins. The fruit carries through on the palate—juicy dark berries, blackcurrant, and a bit of licorice. A gentle spiciness lingers, alongside a slightly earthy or mineral undertone. It’s approachable and easy-drinking, yet retains the varietal character of Syrah without being overly extracted or heavy.

Finish: Clean and moderately long, with a lingering note of dark fruit and a touch of pepper.

Overall impressions. A well-balanced, youthful Syrah that leans toward elegance over power. Great for casual drinking, especially with grilled meats, charcuterie, or lentil dishes. Offers good value and accessibility, with enough character to make it interesting.


SUMMARY 

I’m genuinely torn about this restaurant. I had such high hopes—perhaps because I couldn’t help comparing it to Le Servan. The dishes were, overall, very good, but each had minor technical issues that kept them from being truly exceptional. Small adjustments could’ve made a big difference—like grinding instead of cubing the veal, or not using raw spices in a beurre blanc, which left a slightly bitter finish.


One detail that stood out: utensils weren’t changed between courses. I understand space is tight in the kitchen, but that’s a basic service standard—and investing in a dishwasher would go a long way.

Service was a bit uneven. The male staff were kind and attentive, but there was some visible tension in the back of house. One of the bus staff, the only woman on the team, came out in tears at one point. She composed herself quickly, but understandably didn’t seem in the best spirits. Also, we had to wait an unusually long time between the entrée and main course.

Another thing to note: it can get very noisy. The space is lively and energetic, but at times it was difficult to hear each other across the table—which might not suit everyone, depending on the occasion, eg not suitable for a romantic dinner

That said, I’d still consider going back. My friends loved their meals (entrées and plats), and I see real potential here. For me, it was an above average experience, with a few thoughtful refinements, it could become something truly special.

 For 1-bottle of wine, 5-entrées, 3-plats, 2-desserts, 1 bottle of water, for 4-of us our bill came to €268 or €67 each.

No comments :

Post a Comment